Why Does It Take Two Lawyers For a Pre-Nuptial Agreement?

When couples are planning to marry and one party is contemplating asking the other to sign a Pre-Nuptial Agreement, I am often asked why I can’t represent both parties when I draft the agreement. The answer is simple: because each party has conflicting interests.

When one person enters into a marriage with another person, each acquires specific rights with respect to the martial property. In order to represent both parties, I would be obligated to advise party #1 that without a pre-nuptial agreement, his or her assets may be in jeopardy in the event of a divorce. At the same time, I would be obligated to advise party #2 that he or she may be entitled to some portion of those same assets if a pre-nup is not signed. This is a clear conflict.

Instead, an attorney will represent one party by drafting the prenuptial agreement. The second party should engage the services of an independent attorney to review the agreement and advise him or her of the legal ramifications of signing — or not signing — it.

The following is a link to an interesting post on the subject of pre-nups and post-nups courtesy of Estate Planning Bits blog:

Why You May Need a Prenuptial or Postnuptial Agreement

About these ads

One comment on “Why Does It Take Two Lawyers For a Pre-Nuptial Agreement?

  1. Seeing that we already happen to be discussing points regarding Why Does It Take Two Lawyers For a Pre-Nuptial Agreement? Connecticut Lesbian and Gay Law, Natural law has always been linked to ultra-human considerations, that would be to say a spiritual or moral influence determinant of their understandings of the way law operates. 1 of the founding principles is that an immoral law may very well be no law at all, on the basis that a government wants moral authority to be in a position to legislate. For this cause, natural law theories have been utilized to justify anarchy and disorder at ground level. This had lead to widespread criticism of the natural law principles, which have had to be refined and created to fit with contemporary thinking. On the flip side, natural law has been used as a definitive method of serving ‘justice’ to war criminals and former-dictators after their reign.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s